INDUCTIVE LOGICAL CONSTRUCTIONS - CHAPTER THREE PHYSICS, Post-Specialized Part

13. What follows is a conclusion which seemingly should not belong to the part of the book dealing with physics, but its connection with matter is exceptionally strong, as we have had the opportunity to find out ourselves. The model of matter and its interactions, which we have so far constructed, has a retroactive influence on all the conclusions we have made prior to it.

Let us consider complex matter, i.e. matter which is made up of a number of complex variants of the mono-corpuscle. Envisaging unifications as consecutive and periodic processes, we cannot fail to notice that the multiples (the ones the process of matter’s unification reaches) of the elementary period increase their values with every other unification. In the simplest of cases, this is a geometrical progression which has a fast growing function. Second, we have mentioned that the forms of matter which emerge after every other unification are more and more inert, i.e. the difference between their energy and the energy of the primary form of matter becomes greater and greater. Third, the period of every process of unification would be determined by the number of interactions (i.e. hybridizations), rather than a time interval, and it would grow with every other unification of a higher rate. As regards the last statement, we should admit that the reverse is also valid – the number could remain the same. If this be true, we should be dealing with interactions of objects belonging only to this level of unification. However, the realization of the above-mentioned is rather uncertain in view of the accidental nature of the interaction. Thus the time of a high-rate process of unification could be several times as long as the mono-corpuscle’s elementary period, and the process could involve the leveling out of the energy differences between elementary matter and higher matter.

The long period in which higher matter is in a different and unstable state creates another long-lasting form of matter, which in accordance with all the schemes of inductive logic we have used, can be identified with reason. Such a logical construction is loaded with meaning. First, the short-lasting unifications within lower matter could be interpreted as forms of reasonable matter. Second, from this it follows that reason has developed alongside matter as one of its forms. Third, reason is an alternative, different and unstable form of matter. This is where the perpetuum mobile of reason should be sought. Fourth, reason could not exist without matter, for without it, it would be nothing. Fifth, if reason is a form of matter, it can affect matter. This is what constitutes its independence. Sixth, the higher forms of reason possess a more complicated period of unification. Seventh, the dialectical category of ‘the thing’s reflection upon itself’ is nothing else but unification. This is where the following two things are bridged: the creation of the concept of the thing during the reflection and the leveling out with a multiple of the elementary period. Both of them are balancing states of the thing. Eighth, there is reasonable matter only with hybrid non-unification, which is possible only with a mono-corpuscle. Therefore, matter is the primary substance in the universe.

This thread of logic shows that Man cannot be the only reasonable matter in the universe. On the contrary – some forms of dead matter could be referred to as reasonable. This view of the questions we have considered so far could be defined as a reflection of this theory upon itself.

Within this framework of logic, non-unified reasonable matter’s indifference to itself on every level of unification would be of particular interest. According to all dialectical laws, reason should interact only with levels different from its own, be it within a single unification or every one of them. In the first case we would be dealing with a relation between similar types of reason, whereas in the second case we would be dealing with a balancing interaction with matter itself or with other types of reason. Thus reason’s subject turns out to be everything that reason perceives as different from itself: matter, an alternative interpretation of it, as well as other types of reasonable matter. This last could be a proof of the appropriateness of our global scheme as a method. The deduction of the essence of the logical scheme of human reason is modeling in its own right, but the periodic nature of reason’s manifestations on different unification levels proves that besides our own reason all other forms of reasonable matter have the same logical system. From this it follows that in deploying our own system in the study of matter’s interactions, we have not simply discovered what matter looks like from our own point of view, but from any other point of view as well.

Having found reason on all levels of matter, we have in fact supported the law of unity even with the instruments of formal logic. Therefore, its force and applicability are absolute – it is valid for all forms of matter, be them reasonable or not, i.e. unified or not. There is even more than this. Philosophical laws as a large-scale logical system embracing all things in existence and all non-existent things are nothing but a logical notion devoid of concreteness. Since they are a manifestation of reason, they are valid for all spheres of knowledge, physics included. The unity of its subject and the carrier of the system define the system’s applicability as absolute. That is why I will address the physical community with the following appeal: Do not be blind for the world! There are philosophical works which can be of great help to you in your research. Make use of those brilliant minds’ achievements, for they have contributed to human knowledge more than all of you. Use magic or mathematics if you wish, but do not turn them into a source of learning, for it is reason only that can be so in its manifestation as unification of matter.

14. The alternative nature of non-unified matter could be considered as regards all levels of unification. The long-lasting, although minimal, situation which is being created in this way will influence the rest of matter. If we consider unification as something which has a more general character than we thought, we can assume that it can reach a period other than the multiple periods of the elementary period. At the time we were synthesizing the concept of mass we analyzed a similar situation and arrived at the conclusion that the energy reduction, which is different in relation to the mono-corpuscle, presumes an interaction with it. However, taking into consideration the accidental nature of the interaction, we arrived at the conclusion that the interaction takes place primarily between the mono-corpuscle and unified matter. Now, that we are examining unification on a more general basis, which is ironically a special case of the interaction, we will presume that it can be concluded in a period other than a multiple of the elementary period. The formation of non-unified hybridization is absolutely accidental, but afterwards on a higher level of unification, the formation of matter possessing a period which is multiple of that hybrid period is a natural phenomenon. We shall define this instance of setting the parameters of a specific hybridization as regeneration. Thus regeneration ceases to be an accidental process. The emergence of hybridization on a lower level of unification suggests the development or simply the emergence of similar ones on a higher level of unification as well as on the same one. Naturally, such a thing on a       lower level of unification is utterly impossible. Regeneration is not an emergence of matter from nothing, although fro the point of view of contemporary physics it is indeed so, but a channeling of the process of the formation of more complex matter. This is a possibility that can be realized under certain conditions. That we do not know what those conditions are prevents us from mining gold on an industrial scale. This is a joke, of course. The important thing is that regeneration or re-creation is not observed only in the higher species of organic matter, and the reason why it is observed in them is that it can be observed on all levels of matter.

A direct corollary of the above-mentioned phenomenon is the conclusion that the coming into being and the development of the higher forms of reason, they being higher levels of organization of matter, are naturally predetermined by the lower ones. Therefore, the species of human reason is a serious step in the development of reason as such; and as regards the level of understanding of matter, human reason is an alternative form of reason as such and being so it is an enormous source of logic not just for itself but for higher forms of reasonable matter as well. Its alternativeness combined with the degree of its individuality as expressed with the formula ‘aware of its own reason’, define it as belonging to one of the primary levels of reason’s development. This in turn defines Man as possibly the most alternative and independent reasonable form of matter. In view of the fact that the above-mentioned will be discussed in detail in the next chapter, we will resume our analysis of regeneration. We have arrived at the conclusion that as regards higher matter the period of unification is more complex than in all other cases. The peculiarities of reasonable matter do not necessarily make that period longer, due to the well-known fact that it is defined better than the rest (i.e. the extent of accidental occurrences is strongly reduced, due to the emergence of similar hybridizations). That is why we can state that it is logical that this period with higher reasonable forms is shorter, but the clash with the great hybrid period could be considered as a source of development for this type of reason. In other words, difference again appears to be the cause of matter’s motion or interactions.

Just like unification can be concluded in a period which is not an exact multiple of the elementary period, regeneration can result in the emergence of some semblance of the original, rather than its replica. This phenomenon can create an illusion of intelligence in some species. The same conclusion could be formulated in the following way: The residue to ‘ideal’ regeneration can be distributed among other reasonable species. In this case a reasonable form should, therefore, be considered as a community of individuals sharing the same type of intellect and having a certain degree of independence. Thus it can turn out that some animal species are the addition human reason needs to achieve its regenerative form. It is true that this sounds rather strange, but it is a possibility we have arrived at with the help of logic. Creating large communities of reasonable individuals within the same interpretation, this possibility successfully fits in the field form of the carrier of information. Such reasoning could become an acceptable starting point in the explanation of collective behavior, which has been the object of experimentation for a long time. It turns out that society, etymologically speaking, is not an accidental coexistence but a low-governed phenomenon, related to the convergence of the species, rather than territorial separation. It also turns out that the existence of species accompanying intellect is possible. Physicists might wonder what the part of society in this chapter is, but they should never forget that what we are dealing with is not a simple sum, but a community of separate species of hybrid matter among whose elements are the interrelations in the animal kingdom as well. The close relationship between regeneration as a process within matter and the community as a conclusion the above-mentioned process signifies that the scientific concept of society is much wider and deeper than it was thought. Defining society as a global concept only means that it is not just physics that needs to analyze the concepts it uses, and that the mere defining of a concept is not in fact the analysis needed. Generally speaking, the analysis of any phenomena and processes cannot possibly neglect their origin, i.e. matter. What we are trying to demonstrate with our arguments is the profound relationship between matter and its manifestations and interactions.

15. At the end of this chapter I will try to play the part of a fortune teller and predict the reaction of physicists to it. First, I will be criticized that it does not contain any formulae. This is a philosophical treatise and not a mathematical one after all. As far as I can remember, I announced from the start that I would not present the reader with the plans for a new bomb. Then, due to their misinterpretation of the essence of the exposition, some will start digging, or, as they will refer to it, analyzing the arguments word by word, phrase by phrase. As regards analysis, I have already explained what should be analyzed. As regards the words and phrases, I can support every last one of them with ease. And finally, in their reluctance to renounce the century-long unification of the general theory of relativity, or driven by their nihilistic intention to render my theory senseless, they will bury their heads in the sand. As regards the former, I have said a number of times that everything and everything everywhere is governed by laws. As regards the latter, when they claim that everything has already been discovered, they will not know what physical theories to use in support of their cause and will only come up with theories which only outwardly resemble the theory of mono-corpuscles. What is more, not a single physicist will consider the above-mentioned theory’s logical synthetic nature an advantage, on the contrary – it is this feature that will be severely criticized. The reader, who has understood the exposition, can try to defend my theory on my behalf, but I advise them not to do it, for it is apparent that it will take a new generation of physicists (to do it).

One sunny day, when a physicist studying the weak interactions of elementary particles (something I can only compare with Michaelson’s experiment), announces that the atom is not electro-neutral, theoretical physics (which will still be a pro-mathematical science) will try to reduce the electrical interaction to different types and causes of the electrical charge, but it will sooner or later fail. At the same time experimental physics will submit more evidence supporting the find. In this battle, which will be between leading universities, more than between theoretical and experimental physics, someone will remember that there has been a philosopher who has predicted that very thing. In the mean time another generation of erudite scientists, inclined to interpret matter from a strict philosophical standpoint, will have already appeared, and they will be able to find the solution to the problem in a very short time. If the military decide to make public their experiments related to my theory, it will turn out to be really beneficial to humanity.

The Catholic world will openly declare war on this philosophical system. This will be its second biggest mistake after pressing the Earth flat, and one worth of Islamic fundamentalism. Only Buddhism, which is a system of values, rather than a religion, will welcome my work.

The attitude to the spirit of the book rather than its subject will make the thinking part of humanity keep their attention on it for a long time. It is precisely at this time, when that new generation of scientists, who will contribute to the development of physics and the remaining spheres of knowledge, will emerge. As regards philosophy, it will create the illusion that it has stopped its development.


Next